After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are reviving these systems. Out of lie recognition tools tested at the edge to a program for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being made use of in asylum applications. This article explores how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unstable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs the capacity to browse through these systems and to pursue their legal right for coverage.
It also displays how these types of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from accessing the stations of safeguard. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight into the disciplinary This Site mechanisms these technologies, in which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects who have are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these systems have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double result: when they help to expedite the asylum process, they also generate it difficult intended for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions made by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.
